Infiniti Q50 2013 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is more dynamic to drive. Infiniti Q50 engine produces 41 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Infiniti Q50 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Infiniti Q50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Infiniti Q50 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Infiniti Q50 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Infiniti Q50 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Infiniti Q50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Infiniti Q50) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is smaller. Infiniti Q50 is 14 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 546 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Infiniti Q50 has 46 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`130 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti Q50 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |