Infiniti Q50 2013 vs Mazda CX-3 2015
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is more dynamic to drive. Infiniti Q50 engine produces 91 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 146 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Infiniti Q50 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.8 | |
|
The Mazda CX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Infiniti Q50 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Infiniti Q50 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1400 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| Infiniti Q50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is larger, but lower. Infiniti Q50 is 52 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Infiniti Q50 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
|
Infiniti Q50 has more luggage capacity. Infiniti Q50 has 150 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti Q50 is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3, which means Infiniti Q50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Infiniti Q50 is better rated in child safety tests. The Infiniti Q50 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti Q50 has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |