Infiniti Q50 2017 vs Kia Optima 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Infiniti Q50 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 405 HP | 68 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 475 NM | 187 - 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 8.9 seconds | 7.4 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 10.8 | 1.6 - 8.5 | |
|
Infiniti Q50 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is smaller. Infiniti Q50 is 5 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Infiniti Q50 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 510 litres | |
| Infiniti Q50 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti Q50 is 1.3 metres more than that of the Kia Optima, which means Infiniti Q50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`077 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti Q50 has
|
Kia Optima has
| |