Infiniti Q50 2013 vs Volvo C30 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Infiniti Q50 is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo C30 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.7 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 405 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 475 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 - 8.5 seconds | 6.7 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 9.3 | 4.5 - 9.0 | |
|
Infiniti Q50 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30. On average, Infiniti Q50 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Infiniti Q50 is larger. Infiniti Q50 is 52 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 921 litres | |
|
Infiniti Q50 has more luggage capacity. Infiniti Q50 has 249 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti Q50 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means Infiniti Q50 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`848 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Infiniti Q50 scores higher in safety tests, but Volvo C30 is better rated in child safety tests. The Infiniti Q50 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti Q50 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |