Infiniti FX 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Infiniti FX is more dynamic to drive. Infiniti FX engine produces 62 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 144 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Infiniti FX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 10.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Infiniti FX consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Infiniti FX could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Infiniti FX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Infiniti FX is larger, but lower. Infiniti FX is 6 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Infiniti FX is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 776 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1826 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Infiniti FX has 202 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Infiniti FX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 83 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti FX is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Infiniti FX can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`340 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti FX has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |