Infiniti FX 2003 vs Nissan Murano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Infiniti FX is more dynamic to drive. Infiniti FX engine produces 32 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power Infiniti FX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 10.6 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Infiniti FX consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Infiniti FX could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Nissan Murano) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Infiniti FX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 26 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Infiniti FX is larger, but slightly lower. Infiniti FX is 4 cm longer than the Nissan Murano, 5 cm wider, while the height of Infiniti FX is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 776 litres | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1826 litres | 2005 litres | |
|
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Infiniti FX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 179 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`340 kg | 2`204 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`890 kg | 1`588 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 450 kg | 616 kg | |
| Infiniti FX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Nissan Murano. Therefore, Nissan Murano is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti FX has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |