Infiniti FX 2003 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 280 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 366 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Infiniti FX engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Despite less power, Infiniti FX reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 | 14.9 | |
|
The Infiniti FX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Infiniti FX consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that by driving the Infiniti FX over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 86 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Infiniti FX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 26 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Pathfinder, Nissan Murano | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Infiniti FX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
| Infiniti FX is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, width is practically the same , while the height of Infiniti FX is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 776 litres | 958 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1826 litres | 2013 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Infiniti FX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover Sport (by 187 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti FX is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`340 kg | 3`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`890 kg | 2`480 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 450 kg | 590 kg | |
| Infiniti FX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti FX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |