Infiniti FX 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 550 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a more dynamic driving. Infiniti FX engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Sport, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Due to the lower power, Infiniti FX reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.3 | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Infiniti FX consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Infiniti FX could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Nissan Navara, Nissan Pathfinder | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Sport might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine: The V9X engine stands out due to its unusual 65-degree V-angle. It features a lightweight cast-iron block, aluminum cylinder heads with hydraulic lifters, a variable geometry turbocharger, and a chain-driven timing ... More about Infiniti FX 2012 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.93 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.78 m | |
| Infiniti FX is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Infiniti FX is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 376 litres | 784 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1870 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Infiniti FX uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Infiniti FX is 1.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Sport, which means Infiniti FX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`520 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`150 kg | 2`115 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 370 kg | 885 kg | |
| Infiniti FX load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Land Rover Range Rover Sport. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover Sport is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti FX has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Sport has
| |