Infiniti FX 2012 vs Nissan Murano 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Infiniti FX is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Murano can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 - 5.0 | 2.5 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 238 - 400 HP | 190 - 255 HP | |
Torque: | 363 - 550 NM | 334 - 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 8.3 seconds | 8 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 13.1 | 8.0 - 10.6 | |
Infiniti FX petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Murano. On average, Infiniti FX equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.93 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.72 m | |
Infiniti FX is larger, but lower. Infiniti FX and Nissan Murano are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 376 litres | 402 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1870 litres | no data | |
Nissan Murano has more luggage space. Infiniti FX has 26 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Murano. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Infiniti FX is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Murano, which means Infiniti FX can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`320 | ~ 2`438 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 15 800 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Infiniti FX has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |