Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Hyundai ix35 engine produces 22 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 2 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 181 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 77 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |