Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai ix35 engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 3 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.9 | |
| Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 207 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |