Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 194 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 22 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai ix35 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Kia Cerato | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
| Hyundai ix35 is 9 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Hyundai ix35 has 53 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Hyundai ix35 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |