Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 194 NM | 192 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
Hyundai ix35 engine produces 13 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 19 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Kia Optima, Kia Cerato | Used also on Honda Accord | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.41 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
Hyundai ix35 is 11 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 556 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai ix35 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | high | |
Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7400 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |