Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Jeep Compass 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 383 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 48 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai ix35 is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1269 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai ix35 has 263 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 167 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Compass is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai ix35 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |