Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Jeep Compass 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 383 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 44 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 6.5 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 1 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 334 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1436 litres | 1277 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 257 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 159 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`140 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |