Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Audi Q3 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 177 HP | |
Torque: | 383 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
Hyundai ix35 engine produces 7 HP more power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Audi Q3. Despite the higher power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Audi Q3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 64 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.41 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
Hyundai ix35 is 3 cm longer than the Audi Q3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | no data | |
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 131 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 1 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`185 | |
Safety: | |||
The Audi Q3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7400 | 12 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |