Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 383 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 34 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 63 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine Nissan Qashqai 2010 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 181 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |