Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai ix35 engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 20 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai ix35 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 207 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |