Hyundai ix35 2010 vs Jeep Compass 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Hyundai ix35 and Jeep Compass have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai ix35 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Compass engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine: The diesel engine is highly reliable when properly maintained, offering an excellent balance of power and fuel efficiency. However, it has several important characteristics and issues that should be ... More about Hyundai ix35 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai ix35 is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 328 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1269 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai ix35 has 263 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests, but Jeep Compass is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai ix35 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |