Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 3 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, but torque is 4 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai ix35 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi ASX, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai ix35 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Hyundai ix35 is 25 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 986 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Outlander, so Mitsubishi Outlander quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |