Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai ix35 and Honda CR-V have the same engine power, but Hyundai ix35 torque is 1 NM more than Honda CR-V. Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2012: Vehicle has automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under normal conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly interacts with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and electric power steering to provide full vehicle control, good traction and maneuverability in all road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai ix35 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Hyundai ix35 is 16 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1669 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |