Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Hyundai ix35 engine produces 8 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Carens | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger, but lower. Hyundai ix35 is 5 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 5 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |