Hyundai ix35 2013 vs BMW X1 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 74 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 140 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2015: This generation BMW has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive system which sends 100% of the torque to the front wheels by default. The system analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when needed. When wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | Used also on BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X1 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is smaller, but higher. Hyundai ix35 is 3 cm shorter than the BMW X1, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai ix35 has 86 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X1 (by 114 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.8 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| BMW X1 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than BMW X1, so BMW X1 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
BMW X1 has
| |