Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Audi Q3 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 68 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
| Hyundai ix35 is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1365 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 131 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 71 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Audi Q3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Audi Q3, so Audi Q3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |