Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix35 engine produces 15 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix35 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix35 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix35 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix35 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai ix35 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2013 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai ix35 2013 1.6 engine Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors. Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
| Hyundai ix35 is 16 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 233 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |