Hyundai ix35 2009 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Hyundai ix35 engine produces 36 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.0 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 201 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2009 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai ix35 2009 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 181 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 77 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |