Hyundai ix35 2009 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 227 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Hyundai ix35 engine produces 27 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai ix35 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix35 could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai ix35 2009 2.4 engine: Generally reliable and easy to maintain engine, with spare parts available. The engine is not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Although the manufacturer does not specify a chain change interval, it ... More about Hyundai ix35 2009 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is larger. Hyundai ix35 is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix35 has 207 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 217 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`060 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |