Hyundai ix35 2013 vs Honda CR-V 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 184 HP | 120 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 383 NM | 190 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 - 12.4 seconds | 9.7 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 8.8 | 4.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Hyundai ix35 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Hyundai ix35 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Hyundai ix35 is 15 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai ix35 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 591 litres | 589 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1436 litres | 1669 litres | |
| Hyundai ix35 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 233 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix35 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Hyundai ix35 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`041 | ~ 2`133 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix35 has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |