Hyundai ix20 2015 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix20 engine produces 25 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix20 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix20 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Hyundai ix20 is smaller. Hyundai ix20 is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1486 litres | 1513 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Hyundai ix20 has 30 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix20 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai ix20, so Nissan Qashqai quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix20 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |