Hyundai ix20 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 124 HP | 135 HP | |
Torque: | 156 NM | 164 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix20 engine produces 11 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix20 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
By specification Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix20 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
870 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
570 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Hyundai ix35 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai ix35 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix20 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hyundai ix20 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. Hyundai ix35 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai ix35 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.41 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
Hyundai ix20 is smaller. Hyundai ix20 is 31 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai ix20 is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 591 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1486 litres | 1436 litres | |
Hyundai ix20 has 151 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix20 (by 50 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Hyundai ix20 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`830 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Hyundai ix20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix20, so Hyundai ix20 quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 4800 | 7400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix20 has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |