Hyundai ix20 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 124 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Hyundai ix20 engine produces 11 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Despite less power, Hyundai ix20 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix20 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai ix35 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix20 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai ix20 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. Hyundai ix35 2009 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai ix35 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Hyundai ix20 is smaller. Hyundai ix20 is 31 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai ix20 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1436 litres | |
|
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space. Hyundai ix20 has 151 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix20 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai ix20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix20, so Hyundai ix20 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix20 has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |