Hyundai ix20 2010 vs Renault Clio 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Hyundai ix20 and Renault Clio have the same engine power, but Hyundai ix20 torque is 20 NM more than Renault Clio. Hyundai ix20 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 3.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 4.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix20 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai ix20 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1500 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia RIO, Kia Venga | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai ix20 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Clio 2012 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Hyundai ix20 is larger. Hyundai ix20 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix20 is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1486 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai ix20 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix20 has 140 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix20 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`658 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Clio scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix20 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |