Hyundai ix20 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix20 engine produces 25 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix20 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix20 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai ix20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia RIO, Kia Venga | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai i40, Kia Optima | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix35 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Hyundai ix20 is smaller. Hyundai ix20 is 31 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai ix20 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1486 litres | 1436 litres | |
| Hyundai ix20 has 151 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix20 (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix20 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai ix20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai ix35 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix20, so Hyundai ix20 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix20 has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |