Hyundai ix20 2010 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai ix20 engine produces 30 HP less power than Alfa Romeo MiTo, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Alfa Romeo MiTo. Due to the lower power, Hyundai ix20 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means that by driving the Hyundai ix20 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai ix20 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 48 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai ix20 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Kia RIO, Kia Venga | Used also on Fiat Grande Punto | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai ix20 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Hyundai ix20 is larger. Hyundai ix20 is 4 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai ix20 is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1486 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai ix20 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai ix20 has 170 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai ix20 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Hyundai ix20 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`685 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Hyundai ix20 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo MiTo has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Hyundai ix20, so Hyundai ix20 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai ix20 has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |