Hyundai i40 2011 vs Jaguar XE 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i40 engine produces 64 HP less power than Jaguar XE, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Jaguar XE. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i40 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai i40 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i40 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i40 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1620 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 1890 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 1250 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Hyundai i40) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Jaguar XE) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.42 m | |
| Hyundai i40 is 7 cm longer than the Jaguar XE, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i40 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1672 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i40 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai i40 has 70 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.66 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i40 is 0.76 metres less than that of the Jaguar XE, which means Hyundai i40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`235 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar XE scores higher in safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i40 has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |