Hyundai i40 2011 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i40 engine produces 39 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i40 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 4.9 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai i40 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i40 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima | Used also on Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i40 is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 553 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1719 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i40 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i40 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Hyundai i40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`150 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai i40 is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai i40 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i40 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i40 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |