Hyundai i40 2015 vs Mazda 6 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i40 engine produces 9 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i40 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i40 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i40 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i40 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1370 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Optima | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i40 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Hyundai i40 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i40 is 3 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i40 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1672 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.94 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i40 is 0.86 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Hyundai i40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`150 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`539 kg | 1`420 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 611 kg | 670 kg | |
| Hyundai i40 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Mazda 6. Therefore, Mazda 6 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i40 has serious deffects in 90 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i40 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |