Hyundai i40 2015 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i40 engine produces 9 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i40 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2015: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.71 m | |
| Hyundai i40 is 19 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i40 is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 506 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1672 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Hyundai i40 has 3 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i40 (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i40 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Hyundai i40 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i40 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i40 has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |