Hyundai i30 2013 vs Kia Ceed 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 164 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i30 engine produces 69 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 101 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that by driving the Hyundai i30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i30 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 250'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i30 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Ceed might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2013 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai i30 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i30 is 1 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i30 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 378 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1316 litres | no data | |
| Hyundai i30 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.34 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.26 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai i30, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |