Hyundai i30 2010 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Hyundai i30 and Kia Ceed have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i30 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 19 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i30 is 1 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1395 litres | 1664 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Hyundai i30 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. This could mean that the Hyundai i30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 269 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |