Hyundai i30 2011 vs Kia Ceed 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Hyundai i30 and Kia Ceed have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
| By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 20 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i30 is 1 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 534 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1664 litres | |
|
Kia Ceed has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Hyundai i30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Ceed (by 269 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`820 kg | 1`820 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`236 kg | 1`317 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 584 kg | 503 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Kia Ceed. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |