Hyundai i30 2010 vs Fiat Bravo 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Bravo is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i30 engine produces 11 HP less power than Fiat Bravo, whereas torque is 69 NM less than Fiat Bravo. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo, which means that by driving the Hyundai i30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i30 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Bravo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Accent, Hyundai i20, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Fiat Grande Punto, Alfa Romeo Giulietta, Alfa Romeo MiTo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Fiat Bravo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2010 1.4 engine: This engine is generally reliable and rarely causes issues.
One of its major concerns is cylinder wall scoring. Early versions were equipped with a large exhaust manifold, but around 2010, it was replaced with a compact catalytic manifold. If the catalytic ... More about Hyundai i30 2010 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i30 is 6 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Hyundai i30 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Hyundai i30 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Fiat Bravo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`720 | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Bravo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |