Hyundai i30 2015 vs Renault Clio 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 164 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Hyundai i30 engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Clio, but torque is 26 NM less than Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.2 | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai i30 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2015 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Hyundai i30 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 443 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`850 kg | 1`705 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`254 kg | 1`199 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 596 kg | 506 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Renault Clio. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Renault Clio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i30 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Renault Clio, so Renault Clio quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Renault Clio has
| |