Hyundai i30 2012 vs Kia Ceed 2012
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 156 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Kia Ceed is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i30 engine produces 15 HP less power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Kia Ceed. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i30 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Ceed engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2012 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. Kia Ceed 2012 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Kia Ceed 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
| Hyundai i30 is 19 cm longer than the Kia Ceed, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i30 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai i30 has 148 litres more trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Kia Ceed has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai i30, so Kia Ceed quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |