Hyundai i30 2012 vs Volvo C30 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i30 engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C30 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Hyundai i30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i30 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1510 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Hyundai i30 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo C30, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i30 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 378 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1316 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage capacity. Hyundai i30 has 127 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 1`780 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`280 kg | 1`331 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 630 kg | 449 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Volvo C30. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai i30 scores higher in safety tests, but Volvo C30 is better rated in child safety tests. The Hyundai i30 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Hyundai i30 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo C30, so Hyundai i30 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |