Hyundai i30 2012 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 15.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai i30 engine produces 18 HP more power than Citroen C3 Picasso, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen C3 Picasso. Thanks to more power Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C3 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i30 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1190 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Hyundai i30 is larger, but lower. Hyundai i30 is 20 cm longer than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i30 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 378 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1316 litres | 1506 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`940 kg | 1`811 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`310 kg | 1`235 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 630 kg | 576 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Citroen C3 Picasso. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai i30, so Citroen C3 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |