Hyundai i30 2011 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2013
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Hyundai i30 engine produces 35 HP more power than Citroen C3 Picasso, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 6.3 | |
| Hyundai i30 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Hyundai Elantra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Hyundai i30 is larger, but lower. Hyundai i30 is 20 cm longer than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 1 cm wider, while the height of Hyundai i30 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 378 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1316 litres | 1506 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`840 kg | 1`753 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`225 kg | 1`204 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 615 kg | 549 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Citroen C3 Picasso. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Citroen C3 Picasso has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Hyundai i30, so Citroen C3 Picasso quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |