Hyundai i30 2017 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 242 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Hyundai i30 engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai i30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Hyundai i30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Hyundai i30 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai i30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Kia XCeed | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Megane 2020 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Hyundai i30 is smaller, but slightly higher. Hyundai i30 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 8 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 602 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1650 litres | 1504 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 146 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Hyundai i30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`886 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`294 kg | 1`275 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 586 kg | 611 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 000 | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |