Hyundai i30 2015 vs Dacia Logan 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 107 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai i30 engine produces 45 HP more power than Dacia Logan, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.9 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Hyundai i30 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Hyundai i30 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai i30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hyundai i30 2015 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
| Hyundai i30 and Dacia Logan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 528 litres | 573 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1642 litres | 1518 litres | |
| Hyundai i30 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Logan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 124 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Hyundai i30 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Dacia Logan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |