Hyundai i30 2017 vs Mazda 3 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 242 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai i30 is more dynamic to drive. Hyundai i30 engine produces 18 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 29 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Hyundai i30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Hyundai i30 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Hyundai i30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Hyundai i30 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Hyundai i30 is 12 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, width is practically the same , while the height of Hyundai i30 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 395 litres | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1301 litres | 1019 litres | |
|
Hyundai i30 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai i30 (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`850 kg | 1`907 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`240 kg | 1`389 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 610 kg | 518 kg | |
| Hyundai i30 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Mazda 3. Therefore, Hyundai i30 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Hyundai i30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Hyundai i30, so Hyundai i30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 23 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Hyundai i30 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |